Seven reasons why Signs is the creepiest movie you didn’t see

sin criterio_shyamalan_signs2

For its 10th anniversary, the Philadelphia film festival screened M. Night Shyamalan’s ‘Signs.’ All I can say is it is one of the creepiest films I’ve ever seen. If you didn’t see it, check out why it’s the creepiest film you never did see.


I never saw Signs in the movie theater in 2002. Having watched The Sixth Sense and Unbreakable, I didn’t quite understand what M. Night Shyamalan wanted to accomplish with Signs. It seemed small, provincial and leagues away from the awesomeness of a social worker ghost and the Glassman.

Everything about Signs is creepy from the opening credits until the final swing.

But, watching Signs during the 21st Philly Film Festival screening, I realized it’s deliberately small and provincial. It’s about a small town and an eggshell fragile family attempting to heal the ruptures caused by absent faith and an absent mother/wife. However, as the characters dealt with those issues, the film’s overarching narrative made me realize that it was also one of the CREEPIEST movies I’ve ever seen. Signs is definitely Halloween-worthy. Everything about Signs is creepy from the opening credits until the final swing. The film provides a classic cinematic thriller feeling along the lines of Rosemary’s Baby. Shyamalan didn’t use gore, bright lights or angry serial killers. Instead, he relied on barking animals, shadowy faces, loud noises and cut off fingers.

So, why is it one of the creepiest movies for the 21st century? Let me count the ways …

  1. The credits set the stage
    Honestly, the credits creeped me out. The perfectly timed dramatic music displaying the credits through a green background with a faint light circle felt inexplicably menacing. Every time a new name flipped up, I jumped. My expecting something when seeing nothing helped set the stage for the rest of the film.
  2. The mundane is scarier than the insane
    Signs felt like an old school Hitchcock where minor things such as a tire squeal, an open pizza parlor door, a field at nighttime, a picture in a book, and a rabid dog felt far scarier than contemporary torture porn flicks.
  3. Absence is presence
    Let me tell you, the less you see in Signs, the freakier it is. By placing the visitors and the protagonists in shadows, by hiding most of the light, and by delaying the reveal of the antagonists and their plans, M. Night Shyamalan lets the audience’s imagination play. Shyamalan scared me more by showing me less. Scenes where Graham possibly faces a visitor through a closed door or in the middle of a corn field had me watching through open fingers.
  4. Humor helps
    Because the film doesn’t scare the audience non-stop, it prevented me from becoming desensitized to the horror. When Merrill discusses his strike out career with the recruiter, Graham listens to the pharmacist’s confessions, and the kids wonder why crop circle geeks can’t get laid, I felt grateful, but I also kept wondering … what happens next?
  5. It features creepy, pale-faced children 
    I have no idea why, but cinema loves creepy pale-faced children. From Children of the Corn to Village Of The Damned to The Shining, all I know is if I see a pale tow-headed child on the side of the road I should run in the opposite direction. Rory Culkin and Abigail Breslin did a great job as Morgan and Bo. But, in the beginning, I wasn’t certain if they were in danger or they WERE the danger. Their pale emotionless faces when they initially discovered the crop circles and when facing their own pets, made me fear them and fear for them.
  6. It cast crazy parental figures
    Come on, let’s be honest. Shyamalan cast two of the craziest men in Hollywood. Maybe they were sane then, but the underlying tension in their characters helped sell the story. Gibson did an excellent job as a man whose internal fractures quietly disrupted his family. Likewise, Joaquin Phoenix rocked as the slightly lost loser brother. My favorite scene in the film includes the two characters standing before the basement door facing the unknown threat. Nothing is hotter than two men protecting their family.
  7. The setting is everything
    All of the film’s shots held an eerie tone. By setting the film within the middle of a farm and on the outskirts of a corn field, we see the protagonists isolated from assistance, which is already scary. However, the house itself also maintained that isolated feel from the basement to the kid’s room to Graham’s morning showers. By using silence and just showing the rooms without overtly insane action, had me on the edge of my seat.
Yes, I know it sounds like I’m a wuss. Yes, I know Signs truly surrounds family and faith. However, the journey to familial re-connection and faith re-discovery is long. But, along the way, Night scares you out of your mind. I wish more people watched it when it initially came out. While it didn’t do too badly by grossing 408 million worldwide after a 72 million budget, I feel it could’ve done even better if people knew what to expect. Honestly, Signs is a Halloween worthy flick and should’ve been released then. However, if you haven’t seen it, you definitely should. Trust me. It’s the creepiest movie you didn’t see.

Photo Credit: Touchtone Pictures

5 Comments on “Seven reasons why Signs is the creepiest movie you didn’t see

  1. Signs is my favorite Shyalaman flick because it has a wonderful balance of humor, heart, and scary moments that don’t rely on gore. The Sixth Sense was far more clever and disturbing, but I have never wanted to watch it again because I’m scared of dead people covered in blood. Which is funny because I have no problem watching extremely violent, bloody movies – as long as they’re not in the horror genre.

  2. I saw signs shortly after release at a resort Movie theater. I thought it was ok at the time but it soured on me when I saw it the second time. From the suicidal aliens and the lines in the movie just seem off. Nobody ever seems to talk right in the movie. I don’t know I guess it just rubs me the wrong way.

  3. This film is awful. M. Night Shyamalan has no talent.

  4. I highly appreciate this review. You nailed it! One of the few critics that really understood the movie’s topic! It’s about family, hurt, fear and how to overcome the pain from the loss and not at all a scifi-movie about an alien invasion. These deliberately stereotyped aliens are just the McGuffin for the psycholgical story.

  5. Signs made almost $228 million in the US. I think a lot of people have seen it. That placed it sixth for the year. What else was out that year? 1. Spider-Man. 2. The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers. 3. Star Wars, Episode II – Attack of the Clones. 4. Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. 5. My Big Fat Greek Wedding. 7. Austin Powers in Goldmember. 8. Men in Black II. 9. Ice Age. 10. Chicago. There were a lot of major movies not even in the Top Ten, including a Bond movie! It was one of four movies in the $200 millions. To crack the Top Ten among that group of films is a pretty big achievement. You talk about it like it was some kind of box office failure.

    Maybe it’s “disappointing” numbers really came from the fact that the studio played it up as an alien invasion movie, and word of mouth dampened some of the enthusiasm when it didn’t really turn out to be that exactly (and the lack of on screen aliens didn’t help). Plus, it didn’t have a “twist ending,” an issue that has hampered Shayamalan to this day. Even at the press screening I attended — and the movie did freak me out a bit sitting in a large auditorium with a handful of people spread out all over the place — we were a little let down by the ending, waiting for the twist, expecting something big to happen. You can have a great movie up to the end, but that’s the last thing people will remember and if you don’t have a great ending, the word of mouth will kill a movie. It obviously didn’t fail because of that, but perhaps it could have made more if it had been marketed a little differently. And Shyamalan still had a lot to live up to at that point. He could probably make the same movie today and people would hail it as a masterpiece because his last batch of movies have been pure crap (in fact, he really hasn’t made a good movie since Signs).

Powered By OneLink