CliqueClack TV
TV SHOWS COLUMNS FEATURES CHATS QUESTIONS

Legend of the Seeker – What do Nicci and Kahlan’s dad have in common?

I loved Michael Nouri's performance as Kahlan's father, even though the writers' reinvented Kahlan's history. I also like the fact that Sister Nicci's role continues to expand.

- Season 2, Episode 14 - "Bound"

Richard carries Sister Nicci

You know what’s nice about Legend of the Seeker being so different from the Terry Goodkind books? I never know what they’re going to change next. Everything I know about the characters and events could be turned upside down. Hey, all I’m expecting is to be entertained, and Seeker succeeds in that department. Take tonight’s episode, “Bound,” for example. We met Kahlan’s parents, learned more about Nicci, enjoyed two whole scenes with His Royal Darken Rahlness, and encountered more fantasy tripe than usual (maternity spells? snake vines? dragon’s breath fireballs? moonflower blossoms? Bahahahaha. I love fantasy).

I had a blast with this episode, even though the writers threw Kahlan’s history out the window. Due to the “maternity spell” (which didn’t make sense, but we’ll let that slide), Kahlan needed to find an object that belonged to her mother so Zedd can break the spell. This provides an opportunity for us to meet Frederick Amnell, Kahlan’s dishonest, greedy father (whose dream was to be a stone carver).

Just for the sake of contrast, let’s recall that in the books, Kahlan’s father was Wyborn Amnell, the king of Galea. Kahlan’s mother, as ruler of the Midlands, could select any mate that she wanted, even one that was already married. And she selected Wyborn not only because he was noble and in an unhappy marriage but because he could teach Kahlan how to fight and wage war. Kahlan’s parents both were dead by the time the books begin.

Okay, so back to “Bound.” Besides having a different name, Frederick is not a king, and he never taught Kahlan to fight or wage war. That’s a shortcoming. I think if Kahlan’s father had been played by an unremarkable actor, I might have been annoyed by this whole story. Fortunately, I really loved Michael Nouri’s performance. He made Frederick fascinating — magnetic — and to be honest, it was his rich, deep voice that instantly won me over. I really enjoyed his scenes with Kahlan.

Obviously, we saw a lot of Nicci this episode. She’s kind of nuts, huh? The new Nicci has a harder edge than the Jolene Blalock model. Her mouth tends to make a little sneer/snarl (snearl?), and since she’s still got Richard’s Han, she likes to stalk around and blast objects and people with lightning bolts. Nicci reveals to Richard that she became a Sister of the Dark after killing a man for raping her. That’s dark territory for Seeker – in fact, Nicci never actually uses the word “rape.” But this episode continues the show’s trend toward darker content. The violence included a beheading and (more disturbing) the aftermath of a snake vine massacre.

I wonder if the writers deliberately created a parallel between Nicci’s and Frederick’s situations — but I thought it was interesting that both of them were taken against their wills, and that’s partly what led to them becoming bad, angry people later.

Next week’s episode, “Creator,” guest stars Oscar nominee Keisha Castle-Hughes as Maia, a.k.a. the Creator. In the books, Goodkind refers to the Creator as a “he,” so this is another example of the Seeker team putting their own twist on the source material. In any case, I’m looking forward to what will hopefully be an epic showdown between the Creator and the Keeper.

So what did you think of “Bound”? Leave a comment, and share your thoughts.

Photo Credit: ABC Studios

7 Responses to “Legend of the Seeker – What do Nicci and Kahlan’s dad have in common?”

March 21, 2010 at 12:37 PM

Basically what they did in this episode, was take the entire plot of the 6th book “Faith of the Fallen”, which imho was one of the best books of the series, and dump it all in one episode. At this rate will reach the end of the book series in the 3rd season.

March 22, 2010 at 1:28 PM

This reviewer was either incredibly dumb or she hadn’t read FOTF yet. You cannot claim to be a fan of the books and say you read them without even knowing what a particular episode was based on. You are not allowed. Especially if you don’t know what the maternity spell was.

Sorry but this review shouldn’t be taken seriously. Nor the reviewer because she talks about the books without knowing what she’s talking about.

Poster above me, you should stop watching Seeker if you feel that way. If all goes well there is at least six seasons planned.

March 22, 2010 at 2:53 PM

LOL. Aren’t you high and mighty? I haven’t read FOTF yet. I’m currently in the middle of reading Blood of the Fold. Nowhere did I say that I’ve read all the books. And I’m surprised that you would take any review of a fantasy show “seriously.”

The fact remains, the maternity spell doesn’t make any sense. I don’t care whether Terry Goodkind came up with it or not. The maternity spell (in the SHOW) is said to create the same bond as between a mother and child in the womb. When a mother cuts her hand, does the baby’s hand also bleed in the same place? No. Obviously, it doesn’t make sense that Kahlan’s hand would bleed when Nicci cut her hand. I don’t know or care whether that was in FOTF or just in the show – it doesn’t make sense. But despite the fact that it’s illogical, I still enjoyed the show.

March 23, 2010 at 10:41 PM

@Ruby Hey, great review. I loved this episode and yes, this one was entirely based on Faith of the Fallen. It’s understandable you didn’t get that because you haven’t read the book, and THAT’S understandable because the books are around 800 pages (the paperbacks, anyway). The Maternity Spell was just supposed to parallel the mother’s bond to the child in the womb, not mimic it exactly. I mean, that’s just a name for that particular spell that seemed to fit. The spell in the book was a little different, only Nicci can control it. And she still had her magic (I think? It’s been a while.) Anyway, in the book she can ‘snip’ the cord between her and Kahlan and Kahlan would die, there was no need for that poison stone she had in her mouth. Also, Frederick in the book was a completely different character, but they tend to use the names in the books for different (minor) characters on the show. I can’t wait to see Nicci develop- if it’s anything like the books, I’ll be a very very happy fan.

As a sidenote, if you don’t already, you should look at the IMDb comment board, it’s fun to read and they have their own little community of LotS fans there.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0844653/board

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0844653/board/nest/159444676

Love the show, love your reviews, as always.

*Edit: They talk about the books freely, so don’t read them if you don’t wanna ruin the books for yourself!

March 23, 2010 at 11:14 PM

Thanks, Teleholic. I always enjoy reading the discussion boards. :-D

March 25, 2010 at 9:13 PM

this actress is so much better as Nicci.

I like that they did the maternity spell. I’m with the first poster where FotF was one of my favorite books in the series. Nicci was just a very intriguing character

March 25, 2010 at 9:18 PM

I don’t know what happened to the rest of my comment but here you go:

It was fun learning about what made Nicci tick. I do wish that they’d give her the black dress!

As for the maternity spell, i thought it was great that Nicci said pretty much what she did in the book after she cast it (telling Richard he as til she gets to the bridge to catch up).

It sucks that they changed both Kahlan & Nicci’s back story, but oh well. Great ep any way.

Powered By OneLink