CliqueClack TV
TV SHOWS COLUMNS FEATURES CHATS QUESTIONS

Eli Stone, RIP

Eli Stone CastI realize this isn’t the timeliest of topics. Long story short, my TiVo worked its magic on the first two episodes of Eli Stone‘s second season; it recorded them in full, and self-deleted them upon completion. Before you recommend to me how to solve the problem, yes, it was set to save all episodes, and yes, it was set to delete only when I manually deleted. It’s a problem I’ve had with my TiVo box since the beginning, and one of the major reasons I dislike DirecTV; their DVR boxes suck. They often don’t automatically update their software, so if your version is outdated, you’ll encounter countless recording problems until you manually update. Real high quality.

Anyway, my wife and I also missed the ball on the tiny window ABC provides for viewing their shows online, so we decided to gamble by waiting for the re-runs to air. In the meantime, we dutifully recorded episodes three through nine.

Well, this past weekend I came to grips with reality: Eli Stone is gone, never to return. Of course, I knew it’d been canceled, but in my heart-of-hearts I held out hope that ABC might see the error in its ways. I mean, my God, shows like (I’m hiding underneath the table here) According to Jim, America’s Funniest Home Videos, The Bachelor, Extreme Makeover: Home Edition, Jimmy Kimmel Live!, Supernanny, Ugly Betty and Wife Swap have all been given longer lives than Eli Stone. Leaves me speechless, too.

So, as I was saying, this past weekend we finally started watching season two. For all intents and purposes, this was a futile exercise, because we already know that the show won’t end. So why bother? Because Eli Stone is that good.

I watched the same promos that you saw last winter, and there was no way I was ever going to watch a show where the main character (Jonny Lee Miller is absolutely fantastic) saw prophetic musical visions. Not to mention the fact that I’m male and under thirty, so George Michael is not exactly a member of my iPod family. But I’m a big fan of Victor Garber, so one day a few weeks into the season I watched the pilot online. I couldn’t believe I was missing it! I sat my wife down that same night to watch the premiere episode with me, and we had season passed the show before the hour was up.

The truth is that the premise aggravates me a bit. Prophetic visions, in modern-day San Francisco? And better yet, ones that tell a lawyer who he should and should not represent? Probably the reason audiences weren’t interested. But Eli Stone isn’t really about prophecy, or God, or fate, or anything spiritual in any way. The show, when it comes down to it, is about finding your way. It’s about taking your broken past (in this case an alcoholic father who it turns out was really suffering from his own prophetic abilities) and utilizing the good and the beauty within to forge a new future for yourself.

In the first season, Eli spends his time getting beaten down by the judicial system. Everyone, from the partners in his firm to the officers of the bar association, question his sanity and his ability to dutifully and competently represent his clients. It was a bit tedious, but nothing more than was necessary to set him up as the perennial do-gooder who bucks the system. By season two, Eli is a named partner in a new firm with his former boss and mentor, Jordan Wethersby (Garber). So far we’ve only seen through episode six, but I am so into the new narrative!

Seeing Eli as managing partner (a role he appears to be filling) is like watching (excuse the tired analogy) an eagle soar. Miller is great at authentically portraying a “real” person, in this case the kind of boss that we all wish we had. His handling of the mole was simple yet brilliant, in that we never see the right move being made on television today; the disgruntled ex-employee always becomes the vindictive nemesis in the long-run. But a true boss forewarns and is then magnanimous; you save the sinner, who then becomes your most loyal of followers. So simple, yet generally not dramatic enough for our entertainment needs. In addition, Miller’s overall acting abilities continue to improve; Jonny Lee is a giant who should move on to real stardom, if only he can find a network that will trust him.

Like I said before, the prophetic theme is irritating. The whole back and forth with Eli’s brother Nate (Matt Letscher), Eli’s guru and friend Frank (James Saito) and the notebook full of prophecies that Eli’s father (Thomas Cavanagh’s back!) left is just stupid. Was the idea that Cavanagh could save the show, or to make the premise even more far-fetched? That mess notwithstanding, season two makes some great moves. Jason Winston George (lawyer Keith Bennett) was a tremendous addition last year, and kudos for expanding his role. Taraji P. Henson’s guest-spot was perfect casting as well; it’s a shame she didn’t become a more permanent addition. Also, good work shuttling Julie Gonzalo and Sam Jaeger to the other firm, although Jaeger’s Matt Dowd is inordinately more tolerable than Gonzalo’s Maggie Dekker. She (as well as Natasha Henstridge’s Taylor Wethersby) was definitely the wrong choice for a love interest for Eli. What ever happened to Laura Benanti from episode one?

I don’t yet know what transpires in the last few episodes, but unless it takes some kind of sick, twisted nosedive, I personally can’t imagine why this show doesn’t make the cut. The shame of it is that eventually, we’ll lose anything and everything that dared to be original. Sometimes it’s for the better (see, or rather don’t see, Viva Laughlin). But, every once in a while, we lose something that was on its way to being really great. It’s too bad.

At least you and I care enough now that it’s over; it’s shame on us once for ignoring quality when it’s readily available to us … it’d be shame on us again if we simply let it drift away.

Photo Credit: ABC

Categories: | Clack | Features | General | TV Shows |

22 Responses to “Eli Stone, RIP”

February 25, 2009 at 4:20 PM

Nice elegy to the show. I loved it too.

February 25, 2009 at 5:59 PM

“Because Eli Stone is that good”

Yeah… no actually it isn’t.

When the aneurysm jumped from Eli to his brother and back it jumped the shark. That’s the reason why people left in drones.

I really liked the first season and was able to disregard so many weird things – but right after that scene I dropped the show like a hot pot. It just got to weird, same reason why I wasn’t able to watch more than one season of Ally McBeal and Men in Trees. Or Grey’s Anatomy after the harbor dream sequence. There has to be some level of sanity.

February 25, 2009 at 7:36 PM

First of all, the “level of sanity” has been missing since the show began; a modern-day prophet? With musical visions? They started out on an unlikely platform.

Second, thanks for filling in some of the missing info. As I said, I haven’t seen the first two episodes, so I didn’t know anything about the aneurism hopping.

Third, in attempting to disagree with the quote of mine that you opened with, all you did was support it. I had posed the question above (why bother starting to watch the second season after knowing it had been cancelled) and provided the quote as an answer (because Eli Stone is that good). Not to comment negatively on the second season, but obviously, I was referring to season one; it was the only thing I had seen. And as you yourself seem to have “really liked” it too, apparently your response to my quote should have been “Yeah… actually it is.” Thanks!

February 25, 2009 at 10:19 PM

I guess you are right.

If you didn’t watch the episode where Fonzie jumped the shark I guess you can claim “Happy Days is that good”.

It’s a pity that that wasn’t the case for a couple of million devout Eli Stone Fans.

February 25, 2009 at 10:33 PM

And thus passed down from the mountain that Sebastian deemed it not good, and not good it was.

Ok, I tease, but just because you didn’t like it, doesn’t mean the rest of us don’t.

February 25, 2009 at 11:35 PM

Wow I’m really at a loss for words.

I don’t want to play captain obvious but this isn’t a case of “Firefly”. This show had some serious flaws and when I name them I get slapped with “Just because you didn’t like it”.

What a lovely argument. Cue the guy telling me to stop watching if I don’t like it.

Well duh…

February 26, 2009 at 6:44 AM

Chuckled at this because I thought Firefly (and Serenity) was just that flawed and bad. Never understood why my friends loved it.

February 26, 2009 at 9:06 AM

I was touch by is invulnerability

oop I meant vulnerability!

February 26, 2009 at 10:05 AM

I’m just saying that I liked the show quite a bit, and many people did (Not enough, obviously).

February 26, 2009 at 10:12 AM

Funny, because after the post went live, my wife read Debbie’s piece about Eli Stone and told me “look out, Sebastian hated it!”

February 26, 2009 at 10:17 AM

Ryan, I’m proud to say that there, I’m a step ahead of you. I’ve never seen a moment of Buffy, Angel or Firefly. I broke my own “rule” by catching the first ten minutes of Dollhouse … huge mistake!

The only work of Whedon’s that I’ve enjoyed were the two episodes of The Office (Business School and Branch Wars) that he directed, and my guess is that’s more because I love the show!

February 27, 2009 at 11:02 PM

Ok, I don’t get that. I mean, like something or don’t, but being proud of never having given it a chance?

February 26, 2009 at 11:46 AM

That’s just it Dorv: I DID TOO (and my comment reflected that).

I really liked Season One. But the way they ended season one and started season two was so awful. And having Tom Cruises’ wife on didn’t help either, I found her guest role to be bland and honestly it frightened me to see my beloved Joey Potter like that. She looked so… unhealthy.

And then, I know this is a bit harsh too, but I really felt like the show started repeating itself with bringing half of Wham back – and it just didn’t feel any special anymore.

I had this feeling before with Ally McBeal and other show, mentioned that too. You just can’t say that the show is “That good” because it wasn’t good anymore, its formula got tiresome – if not for you two then at least for me and a couple of million others. I’m not saying that I am “right” I just wanted to express that in this instance you simply can’t say that it is “That good” in that absoluteness.

But again, like always, that’s just my opinion and I’m not moses ;-)

February 26, 2009 at 12:16 PM

Yes, Katie Holmes frightened me too.

It’s interesting, but one of the show’s best runs (viewer-wise) was season two, episodes 1-4; 22 episodes aired overall, and averaged a little under 7.2 million viewers. While viewership steadily declined those first four episodes of season two, the worst was the fourth episode, at 7.44 million. Sure, it cratered at 3.81 million by the end, but who’s to say that that wasn’t because people already knew it wasn’t coming back?

What I don’t get are shows that are regularly clocking in at 2 million viewers and have received renewals. Whether you liked the plot twist on Eli Stone or not, where’s the line drawn, and what are reasonable extenuating factors?

February 26, 2009 at 2:31 PM

Oh THAT is a can of worms you know… let’s take Friday Night Lights for instance. That show is just awesome (yeah I know that might just be me) – it’s critically acclaimed but has now viewers. DirectTV chose to pick it up and fund it. Might be a pure management decision, financially it’s kind of suicide – but that’s also why every time I write about it I urge the readers to buy the DVDs. Family Guy made it back because of the DVD sales and I bet that’s the same reason why Robot Chicken is still in production.

Also I think that “According to Jim” just has just the same tiny core audience as FNL and I also think that it can’t be that expensive to produce. ABC simply choses to renew it because they most likely think they can market it for syndication because it has no story arc and you can watch an episode from season 4 followed by one from season 1 without even noticing.

Ken Levine once mentioned on his blog that comedies are syndication gold. Jerry Seinfeld made more money from syndication than he did from the original airing I think (he was close to that two years ago I think I read that somewhere linked on TVS).

So there are many many factors. Syndication, DVD sales, the re-run-ability (look at what CBS does with 2 1/2 men at the moment – they blow their competition out of the water with RERUNS(!)) – case in point: CSI. Other networks don’t manage to beat reruns of that either. So those two shows are basically already a two-for-one in the season they originally air – compare that with Lost. Horrible in reruns and ABC is almost forced to rerun Lost and add little gizmos here and there because there are no standalone episodes.

Another example: Smallville. Now that show, as well as Supernatural, is the lead in ratings for the CW. While filmed in Canada it still has to be too expensive to re-finance itself via ad revenue. On TVS recently there was an article with the author saying he can’t understand why it got renewed. I tell you why: because the CW has nothing else to show for. At the moment, that network is basically nothing else but Thursday night. They lose their whole identity if they lose Smallville at the moment and they are grasping at straws with other prequels like Dick Greyson et cetera.

And a final example would be pay TV networks. Here in germany we only have ONE called Premiere, now owned by Rupert Murdoch. At the moment they lose 350 million Euro (roughly 500m US$) a year, their break even is so far up the horizon at the moment you can’t believe they are not going under. But they have to invest. They have to buy the german premiere league soccer license every year because that’s 70% of their audience. They don’t even produce their own shows but buy them from the US. Lost in original dubbing, the blockbuster movies – they HAVE to buy those rights or otherwise the downward spiral will continue. What that resulted in is dropping the rights to US premiere sports like NBA basketball, Baseball and most prominently the NFL rights. That all went to another network. The reason they finance it still is because if Premiere goes bust then the pay TV “experiment” that’s been going on for well over 20 years now and has never been anywhere near profitable (just on paper a couple of years around when they went public at the stock exchange) would have failed – and there would be NO outlet for ANYTHING there. The premier league soccer here in germany would lose enormous amounts of money, the hollywood studios would lose another outlet et cetera.

So I guess (returning to The CW) it’s basically a way to distribute material or maybe just “get it out there” to simply keep going as a company – they do TV so they have to air something. So you _always_ have to also look at who owns the studio and whether there are other reasons for a network to keep producing something. And of course the network execs always play a huge role in this. 30 Rock could’ve been axed right after season 1 no matter how good it was for me and a couple of other comedy “enthousiasts”. So it very well might just be that somebody in an office somewhere saw the first 4 episodes of Eli Stone and decided it didn’t want to finance that anymore and that was just it. Who knows.

February 26, 2009 at 7:49 PM

To my own HUGE personal surprise, I enjoyed Katie Holmes’ turn on the show. I had expected to _hate_ it.

February 26, 2009 at 7:54 PM

I guess what it comes down to is that I CONTINUED to enjoy the show in its second season. As has been pointed out here, its highest rated episodes were for the first part of S2.

I will say this… I enjoyed S2 of Eli Stone more than I enjoyed S2 of FNL, and I love FNL. I purchased the S2 Release date, and still haven’t finished watching (and that’s saying ALOT considering my current living situation, and the seasons I’ve watched since Dec 1 (Grey’s S1-4, Gossip Girl S1, Chuck S1, Sports Night S1, Kitchen Confidential S1, Journeyman S1, and I’ve rewatched Leverage’s S1 (after original airing), HIMYM S4, and have started rewatching HIMYM S2. Living in a Hotel 6 hours away from your friends and family SUCKS!).

February 26, 2009 at 9:27 PM

Eeek. Don’t mention S2 of FNL. You know my take on that and I got blasted for that already too ;-)

February 28, 2009 at 6:50 PM

Okay, so normally, Dorv, I would agree with you and be bothered by someone making that kind of pronouncement. Basically, I was never interested in any of the conceits behind Whedon shows, and as I said, never gave any a chance. But with all the hype about him and his popularity, I thought maybe I was totally off base, and I decided to check out the Dollhouse premiere. And I hated it.

I’m proud of having trusted my own instincts, and tastes, and having ignored Whedon’s hype, in never succumbing to popular opinion to watch his shows. That maybe is more of an accurate way to say it, it’s just a lot more tedious. :-)

February 28, 2009 at 6:58 PM

Yeah, but there’s a couple things you should keep in mind. First off, Joss always starts off kind of weak IMHO, and I’ve heard that complaint before. I thought the Buffy pilot was weak sauce, and the Angel pilot put me off of the show for good (or so I thought). Dollhouse is definitely falling into that pattern.

The quickest way to give Joss an honest shot is Firefly. Its 13 episodes so its not a big investment, and its 13 good episodes, no real drop off or filler episodes.

February 26, 2009 at 8:52 AM

“nose”dive haha (bitter laugh) I wont say more but you’ll see at the last episode

I like your review but in the end it all come down to personal taste. Am a non believer in God and I dont care about that angle because its fun to have a surealist twist sometime. What did the thing for me about that show is Eli Stone himself (Jonny Lee Miller is an astonishing actor!), I just “fall in love” with Eli. I was touch by is invulnerability and his soul searching.

Its a great lost, I mourn.

February 26, 2009 at 11:52 AM

@ChocolatFrog: you have every right not to like Firefly but I guess you have to live with people tearing you apart for it ;-) There is one reason that is absolutely perfect for not liking it, to help you out – it’s “I don’t like space cowboys” (maybe with omitting the “I find that ridiculous”) – nobody can say anything against that. You have to like that or you’ll find the show utterly laughable.

And I’m all with you about Eli Stone. I’m not religious either but the surrealistic angle I liked.

Oh and @Aryeh: I hated the Pilot for Dollhouse too put don’t tell anyone :-)

Powered By OneLink